This unit is by and large an extension of ETC3410 Applied Econometrics, with more models, and more weird things to consider in applied economic modelling and practice. We investigate extensions of the models in ETC3410 (binary, instrumental variables, panel data) to imperfect datasets, which are listed below:
1)Discrete choice when the data is one of a few choices, e.g. ratings on Amazon (which is ordered), or preference in transport (which is unordered) we look into multinomial choice models such as the ordered probit, multinomial logit, some of their extensions.
2)Counts when the data is built based on a count random variable (e.g. number of hospital visits) we look into count regression models such as Poisson or negative binomial models and some extensions.
3)Data from non-representative samples (censoring, truncation, limited samples) say for example, we only collected wage information from employed individuals, or recorded any wage below $X as <$X. We use the Tobit model, Heckman sample selection models (which are extensions of instrumental variable estimation in ETC3410) and associated extensions to deal with these defects.
4)Binary panel data where the dependent variable is a binary choice (e.g. employment status of an individual across 2013-2021). Not too fancy.
Alongside the above we also have concepts such as efficient estimation, set identification, etc. thats driving current econometric research where we have no definite answers to.
The unit is called microeconometrics because the models taught are usually specifically applied to microeconomic data data that concerns individual units (people, businesses, and other microeconomic individual units), and how variables have causal effects on one another. Personally, Im not too interested in these topics but I thought the unit was quite good in introducing advanced, open questions in econometrics that I havent thought of. Combining the conceptual, economics knowledge in this unit with more statistics/machine learning concepts and youll be a well-rounded practitioner of data analytics and modelling.
I thought the underlying philosophy of this unit is conveyed quite well in that real-life data is often quite shit, which makes our models usually quite shit, even with some level of sophistication, and improving these models for better outcomes, instead of piling on complexity and hope for the best is an active area of research right now. Whether this unit is taught well is very subjective, but I thought it was alright.