Hmmmm, so
Intermediate Financial Accounting (IFA2), at the time of writing, is probably regarded as the hardest subject in the Accounting major. Coming into the subject, I was definitely nervous because so so so many people say its nigh impossible and in comparison to IFA1, it is just in a whole other galaxy.
Now for background, I didnt take accounting in VCE and so the only background of debits and credits I had was IFA1 which I didnt take too seriously and you can probably find my past score somewhere in my posts. IFA2 prides itself on being a true accounting subject in that it focuses almost purely on debits and credits in general journal entries and consolidation worksheets. The first few weeks of the course really mind boggled me because I had entirely forgotten what accounting was and it was a harsh reality check. Noel Boys was our lecturer (and Ill elaborate on him soon) and he said in the opening lecture that he assumes 100% knowledge of IFA and ARA. This is quite daunting, however the first lecture sort of covers what he means like he presumes we already know the Conceptual Framework (that assets are resources controlled by blah blah past event blah blah future economic benefits and all that), in addition to reporting regulations. However, the lecture covers it all and this is where most students lose marks in the mid semester test. The first lecture is huuuuuuge, and it contains a lot of just plain definitions of things like auditors report and all this crap most people pass it over assuming its just sort of catch up from ARA/IFA, make sure you learn it!
So to make this review as readable as possible, Im going to break it up. Ill start with lectures. As said above, the first lecture was huge. Id advise studying it pretty heavily, even in comparison to the weeks after that most people dont study it because its the first week and it contains admin stuff. IFA2 goes through things like cost versus revaluation model for PPE after acquisition, income taxes and foreign currency transactions & translations. This stuff is actually quite full on and takes a fair bit of study each week to keep up to date. At week 7, however, you are met with a whole new beast; consolidations. This topic spans 3 weeks and forms 30% of the final exam. Everyone I knew said consolidations is really the hardest thing in the subject; but I felt as if it would only be difficult if you fell behind. It really takes your understanding and uses it in a completely different way. Note though, I think consolidations has been made easier than previous years and so its not as much of a beast as it was. The lectures themselves are decently long. Noel Boys though, is the best lecturer Ive had at Uni 100%. He is the funniest person and honestly just a whiz. If you have the choice of deciding between Sem 1 and 2, choose the semester with Boys.
The tutorials have set questions from the textbook as practice. These questions are often much harder than the questions in the tutorial and the exam and they often require you to do things that arent required in IFA2. The questions for the tutorial are uploaded on LMS but the numbers arent filled out so you cant do them beforehand so the only option you have for practice beforehand is to do the textbook. That being said, I did all of them and they do create a solid understanding and coming in to the tutorial you can really grasp what the key points your tutor is saying. I think theres 5% marks dedicated to that whole participation thing easy to do, do it. Theres another 5% dedicated to assessable tests on WileyPlus throughout the semester again, easy enough to do so do it.
The mid-semester test Id say is by far the hardest part of IFA2. The average in our semester was 48% if I remember correctly. I dont really have any advice to give, but it really packs in the content. It goes for an hour and has 30 questions (again, if I remember correctly) and really requires you to apply knowledge. Id suggest reviewing EVERY SINGLE SLIDE and make sure you can understand things.
Finally, the exam. We were provided with 4 practice exams which helped consolidate understanding but dont really reflect the actual exam itself. The exam is a mix of theory and application which is interesting as there isnt often much theory throughout the semester it kind of requires your extrapolation. I dont think the exam was necessarily that hard but it definitely contained some tricks. As an example, I scored 65% on the mid sem, but ~85% on the final exam. That kind of reflects the difference in difficulty.