This is the second enjoyable English subject I've stumbled upon so far (the first being David McInnis'
Shakespeare in Performance) and much like that one, almost all the credit I will give this subject is for the way it was run.
The lectures had
direction in that by the time we'd gotten to the end, Tom had made a valid and interesting point about the text, calling upon both close readings and secondary criticism. Each week would manage to weave together some really spectacular arguments with just the right amount of supporting evidence and ancillary discussion (+ a few amusing tidbits like
this thing) without ever compromising the focus or feeling too hurried. So we'd walk out of each lecture having been exposed to a really comprehensive interpretation of the text and
-best part ever, get hyped- IT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED AS JUST